Sexual
intimacy is such a wonderful way to share mutual
feelings of affection and caring. A good sexual relationship with
one's partner has been positively linked, in popular reports, to
various measures of health and well-being. Where married couples
in the "missionary position" are concerned, even many strict religious
fundamentalists are agreed that sexual intimacy is a good thing.
So how is it that something so
wonderful for the "right" people is so terrible as it is made out to be
for others? Can sex really transform from a damaging experience
(for young people) into a perfectly wholesome experience (for adults)
in the course of a couple of years, as official attitudes would have us
believe? And if so, how does this happen?
The fact is no one has proposed a
coherent theory to explain how the same physical act can be transformed
from traumatic to wonderful, based solely -- like our harshest laws --
on the ages of the participants.
Not only is there no such theory,
there is also no body of evidence to indicate that such an age-based
transformation occurs. Firstly, most sexual experiences of boys
are not viewed by them as negative experiences, much less "traumatic"
(see bibliography below for extensive references). Secondly,
where an experience is viewed negatively, or as a source of trauma, the
evidence overwhelmingly points to (lack of) consent as the factor that
explains why the experience was not positive. This passes Occam's
test of simplicity of explanation, and is remarkably consistent with
common sense -- i.e., willing sex = good ; unwilling sex
= bad.
The purpose of this article is to look at what the scientific
literature on the sexual experiences of boys actually can tell us about
the sexual aspect of man/boy love -- it's nature and outcomes.
First, I will review some reasons why some studies appear to show harm
resulting from man/boy relationships. Then I will list the actual
finding of research point by point, with references. In a later
work, I hope to elaborate on these points.
What About All Those Studies?
If you think man/boy sexual relationships are likely to be harmful, you
are not alone. Many are convinced that science confirms popular
condemnations of man/boy love. Most often, harm is taken for
granted as an inevitable or at least a likely outcome of any sexual
contact between a legal minor and someone older. In some cases,
referances are cited. And there is a large body of published
studies to draw upon which tend to reinforce this view. But we
must be careful when research is cited, to observe not only the methods
used, but also the actual findings of the study.
Most of the many studies that find sex
is harmful do so by systematically excluding consensual (“willing”)
relationships from their samples, by a wide variety of creative
means. In some cases, they simply pose the question, “did the
experience involve force or coercion?” and those who answer No are
excluded from the final result (for example, Finkelhor, 1979 -- one of
the most widely cited books in the entire field of social
science). In other cases they sample only from clinical settings
such as rape crisis centers (e.g. Browne & Finkelhor, 1986;
Kendall-Tackett, Williams, and Finkelhor, 1992 -- also very widely
cited).
And still other studies include both consensual and non-consensual
experiences, then find correlations with harm that are predictably much
weaker than those found by studies of only non-consensual experiences
-- yet these weak correlations, entirely explainable by the inclusion
of non-consensual experiences in the sample (called aggregation bias)
are used as a basis to claim or at least imply that the consensual
experiences were responsible for the correlation with later life
problems, with the extreme weakness of the association being glossed
over (e.g. Urquiza and Capra, 1990).
In fact, while hundreds of studies have shown a weak correlation
between non-consensual sex and later life problems (stronger
correlations are found when the window of circumstances is narrowed to
include only the most abusive cases), no study of any statistically
useable sample size has ever looked at boys’ consensual sexual
experiences and found them to be harmful.
The question was essentially put to rest by two important meta-analyses
(Rind and Tromovitch, 1997; Rind, Tromovitch and Bauserman,
1998). These studies, using the most rigorous of all scientific
methods, found that correlations between boys’ sexual experiences and
later life problems dissappeared when non-consensual experiences were
excluded. One of these studies, by virtue of its higher-profile
publication, received a great deal of public criticism -- but
importantly, no author of any of the original research that these
authors analyzed has joined this criticism.
The Actual Findings
Below is a list of published studies
relevant to questions frequently asked of NAMBLA. For
convenience, the list is grouped into particular points of interest and
the studies relevant to that point. The list of studies
supporting each point is hardly exhaustive, but taken together, this
list fully and accurately represents the range of actual research
findings available relevant to these questions. To those who are
inclined to further study of this subject, the bibliographies that may
be found at the back of each of these articles or books will serve as
invaluable research tools.
The available research supports the following conclusions:
1. Most sexual contacts between boys and older partners
are consensual -- in academic terms, they are not forced or
coerced.
Baurmann, M. C. (1983). Sexualitat, gewalt und psychische folgen.
Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.
Sponsored by the German Ministry of
Justice, this is probably the largest study of sexual violence against
minors ever conducted. The researchers reviewed every reported
case of rape against a person under 21 and every reported case of
illegal sexual contacts with a person under 14. The sample
included approx. 8,000 girls and approx. 800 boys. A subset of
the cases, including 114 boys, were closely examined using two
objective psychological tests and two different methods of subjective
evaluation in each case. While half of the girls had reported
being coerced or forced (this group was primarily teenaged girls raped
by males in their twenties), none of the boys in the sample reported
coercion in their experience.
Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic
examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college
samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.
A “meta-analysis” is a study of
multiple studies, in which samples are statistically combined to
achieve a more statistically powerful result. The method
has been used in many fields of study and is highly regarded among
researchers. This meta-analysis included 59 different
studies of “child sexual abuse.”
Finkelhor, D. (1979). Sexually victimized children. New York:
Free Press.
Finkelhor is a masterful spin-doctor,
but in this book he makes two mistakes: It seems evident here that his
career is based on a desire to discredit the social movements of the
1960s, but more importantly, the text tells several bald-faced lies
about the data he collected. He reports that among his
non-clinical sample of 84 boys who had sexual contacts with older
partners, 33%
2. Boys who have sexual contacts with older partners
usually feel the experience was harmless or beneficial.
Baker, A. W. & Duncan, S. P. (1985). Child sexual abuse: A study of
prevalence in Great Britain. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9,
457-467.
This study of a nationally
representative population sample, is among the largest and best-sampled
studies ever conducted on sexual experiences of the general
population. The actual findings of this study are extremely
eye-opening, despite the authors' apparently strong sex-negative bias.
Li, C. K., West, D. J., and Woodhouse,
T. P. (1993). Children’s sexual encounters with adults.
Buffalo: Prometheus.
West was the Director of the Institute
of Criminology, and Professor of Clinical Criminology at the University
of Cambridge, where he was a Fellow of Darwin College.
3. Boys who have sexual contacts with older partners
usually do not feel negatively about the experience.
Finkelhor, D. (1979). Sexually victimized children. New York: Free
Press.
Fromuth, M. E., & Burkhart, B. R. (1987). Sexual victimization
among college men: Definitional and methodological issues. Violence
Victims, 2, 241-253.
Goldman, R. J., & Goldman, J. D. G., (1988). The prevalence and
nature of child sexual abuse in Australia. Australian Journal of Sex,
Marriage, and Family, 9, 94-106.
Li, C. K., West, D. J., and Woodhouse, T. P. (1993). Children’s sexual
encounters with adults. Buffalo: Prometheus.
Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic
examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college
samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.
Schultz, L., & Jones, P. (1983). Sexual abuse of children: Issues
for social service and health professionals. Child Welfare, 62, 99-108.
4. Many boys who have sexual contacts with older
partners report strongly positive feelings about the experience.
Okami, P. (1991). Self-reports of “positive” childhood and adolescent
sexual contacts with older persons: An exploratory study. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 20, 437-457.
Sandfort, T. G. M. (1982). The sexual aspect of paedophile
relations. Amsterdam: Pan/Spartacus.
Sandfort, T. G. M. (1984). Sex in pedophiliac relationships: An
empirical investigation among a non-representative group of boys. The
Journal of Sex Research, 20, 123-142.
Sandfort, T. G. M. (1987). Boys on their contacts with men. Elmhurst,
New York: Global Academic Publishers.
Tindall, R. H. (1978). The male adolescent involved with a pederast
becomes an adult. Journal of Homosexuality, 3, 373-382.
5. Boys who have non-coerced sexual contacts with older
partners are not psychologically less adjusted than other males.
Bauserman, R., & Rind, B. (1997). Psychological correlates of male
child and adolescent sexual experience with adults: A review of the
nonclinical literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 105-141.
Coxell, A., King, M., Mezey, G., & Gordon, D. (1999).
Lifetime prevalence, characteristics, and associated problems of
non-consensual sex in men: Cross sectional survey. British
Medical Journal, 318, pp. 846-850.
Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic
examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college
samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.
6. The degree to which a boy feels free to guide
or to end the contacts, i.e. the degree of consent, is the single
largest determining factor in whether he will feel negatively about the
experience and whether it will affect his psychological adjustment.
Bauserman, R., & Rind, B. (1997). Psychological correlates of male
child and adolescent sexual experience with adults: A review of the
nonclinical literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 105-141.
Constantine, L. L. (1981). The effects of early sexual experience: A
review and synthesis of research. In L. L. Constantine & F.M.
Martinson (Eds.), Children and sex (pp. 217-244). Boston: Little, Brown
and Company.
Constantine, L. L. (1983). Child sexuality: Recent developments and
implications for treatment, prevention, and social policy.
International Journal of Medicine and Law, 1983, #2, 55-67.
Coxell, A., King, M., Mezey, G., & Gordon, D. (1999).
Lifetime prevalence, characteristics, and associated problems of
non-consensual sex in men: Cross sectional survey. British
Medical Journal, 318, pp. 846-850.
Finkelhor, D. (1979). Sexually victimized children. New York: Free
Press.
7. The age at which someone has a sexual experience is
not a useful predictor of their later psychological adjustment.
Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic
examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college
samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.
8. The particular physical act that occurs during
consensual sexual contacts between a boy and an older partner is not a
useful predictor of his later psychological adjustment.
Bauserman, R., & Rind, B. (1997). Psychological correlates of male
child and adolescent sexual experience with adults: A review of the
nonclinical literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 105-141.
Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic
examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college
samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 22-53.
9. Men who love boys cannot be distinguished from other men on
standard personality inventories and other psychological tests.
Okami, Paul and Goldberg, Amy "Personality Correlates of
Pedophilia: Are They Reliable Indicators?" Journal of Sex Research,
Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 297-328, August, 1992.
Here are some of the most
widely cited publications finding a correlation between non-consensual
sex and negative outcomes, often mis-used to condemn consensual sex:
Finkelhor, D. (1979). Sexually victimized children. New York: Free
Press.
Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A
review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66-77.
Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993).
Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent
empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164-180.
Urquiza, A. J., & Capra, M. (1990). “The Impact of Sexual Abuse:
Initial and Long-Term Effects.” In M. Hunter (Ed.) The Sexually Abused
Male: Prevalence, Impact, and Treatment - Volume 1. (pp.
105-135). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
|